ABSTRACT
Introduction: VCA transplantation is progressing despite challenges including the COVID-19 pandemic. Method(s): The OPTN cohort includes 108 VCA candidates listed and 66 recipients transplanted between 7/3/2014 - 4/30/2022. Result(s): Seven VCA candidates were listed in 2021: 3 abdominal wall (AW) and 4 uterus. One AW and 2 uterus candidates were listed in the first 4 months of 2022. AW registrations became the predominant registration type on the VCA waiting list in 2022, surpassing uterus registrations. As of 4/30/2022, the waiting list included 17 candidates: 6 AW, 5 uterus, 4 upper limb (UL;1 bilateral, 3 unilateral), 1 face, and 1 face/scalp. Since 7/3/2014, 66 recipients received 67 VCA transplants, including 14 UL (9 bilateral, 5 unilateral), 9 face, 1 bilateral UL and face, 1 scalp, 1 trachea, 2 AW, 36 uterus (14 deceased donor, 22 living donor), and 2 penis recipients. In 2021, 1 bilateral UL, 1 trachea, and 2 living donor uterus transplants were performed. In the first 4 months of 2022, 3 uterus transplants (2 deceased donor, 1 living donor) were performed. Discussion and Conclusion(s): The composition of the VCA waiting list is changing. VCA transplantation continues to advance despite the COVID-19 pandemic.
ABSTRACT
COVID-19 is an emerging pandemic. The course and management of the disease in the liver transplant setting may be difficult due to a long-standing immunosuppressive state. In Egypt, the only available option is living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). In our centre, we have transplanted 440 livers since 2008. In this study, we report a single-centre experience with COVID-19 infection in long-term liver transplant recipients. A total of 25 recipients (5.7 %) had COVID-19 infections since March 2020. Among these recipients, two developed COVID-19 infections twice, approximately three and two months apart, respectively.Copyright © 2021 The Author(s)
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Access to kidney transplantation has always been a problem in the African countries with many patients having to travel to other medically advanced countries in Asia, Europe and America. This involves unnecessary excessive expenditure and the travails of journey and stay in an unknown foreign land. To ease this situation and to provide affordable Renal transplant services in their home land, we have made an effort to start the transplant services at our medical facility and have successfully carried out about 275 transplants over a period starting from Nov 2018 till September 2022. Method(s): All the Kidney transplants done between the period Nov 2018- September 2022 (275 cases) were included in the analysis. All the transplants were performed at a single center and the data were collected progressively during their Pre transplant evaluation, perioperative course and post op follow up. All the laboratory and radiological tests were done locally at the center except the HLA cross matches and tissue typing, which were outsourced to Transplant immunology labs outside the country. All the patients with positive DSA titres [about 70%], underwent Plasmapheresis and received IVIg before the transplantation. immunological assessment was done by NGS high resolution, for A B C DP DQ DR loci and X match was done by SAB analysis for class 1 and Class II antigens. All the patients underwent laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. All Patients received vaccinations for Hepatitis B, Pneumonia, Infuenza & Covid. Result(s): A series of 275 kidney transplants were performed over a period of 42 months [ Nov 2018- September 2022] at a private hospital successfully. All the cases were live donor kidney transplants with majority of the donors being 1st or 2nd degree relatives or spousal donors. About 70% of the patients had some degree of sensitization in the form of weakly positive B cell X match, or positive for DSAs at CL I, CLII with MFIs > 1000. All high-risk patients received induction with rabbit Thymoglobulin, and IV methyl prednisolone. Around 50 patients received Basiliximab. Of all patients, 4were HBsAg positive, and 6 were HIV positive,& HCV 1 patient. 8 patients required pretransplant Parathyroidectomy for refractory hyperparathyroidism, 3 patients required simultaneous native kidney nephrectomy at the time of transplant. 25 patients had multiple renal vessels which were double barreled and anastamosed.4 patients had lower urinary tract abnormalities requiring simultaneous/subsequent repair. Overall, 4 patients underwent 2nd transplant. All the donors underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy. Most of the patients had good immediate graft function except in 40 patients, who had delayed graft function;most of them improving over 2 - 6 weeks. 6 Patients had hyperacute rejection and the graft was lost,.4patients had main renal artery thrombosis, Renal allograft biopsy was done in 20 patients. Overall, the Patient survival was 95 %.at 1 year and graft survival 90%. Conclusion(s): Our experience shows that kidney transplantation is a viable and practical option for End stage kidney disease and can be performed even in resource constrained centers in third world countries and the survival rates of patients and the grafts are comparable to other centers across the world. No conflict of interestCopyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Kidney transplantation is the best treatment option for patients with end-stage kidney diseases. Quality and longevity of life are better with kidney transplant than chronic dialysis. Kidney paired donation and ABO incompatible kidney transplant (ABOiKT) are among the strategies to expand the living donor pool to overcome shortage of organs. Although first ABOiKT done in 1951 by Hume et al. was an unsuccessful attempt;Alexander et al. in 1987, proposed desensitization protocol with successful ABOiKT. Advancements in desensitization protocols have resulted in increasing success with ABOiKT. In developing countries like India, numbers of ABOiKT are steadily increasing. Aim of this study was to assess short term outcome of ABOiKT and their comparison with ABO compatible kidney transplant (ABOcKT). Method(s): This was a single center prospective observational study done over a period of 2 years. All the living donor kidney transplants including both ABOcKT and ABOiKT done between September 2020 to August 2021 at Jaslok Hospital and Research Center, Mumbai were included in this study. All ABOiKT recipients underwent pre-transplantation desensitization with injection rituximab and plasmapheresis. Pretransplant isoagglutinin titer of <= 1 : 8 was considered acceptable. Inj. Antithymocyte globulin (ATG) (1mg/kg), Inj. Anti-T lymphocyte globulin (ATLG) (3 to 5 mg/kg) or Inj. Basiliximab (20mg 2 doses 4 days apart) was used as induction agent. Triple immunosuppression regimen of prednisolone, tacrolimus and mycofenolate mofetil was started 7 days prior to transplant in ABOiKT and 2 days prior to transplant in ABOcKT and continued in post-transplant period. Valganciclovir was given to all patients for Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection prophylaxis for 6 months. All the transplant recipients were followed up at 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after transplant and in between when clinically indicated. Data collected was analyzed at the end of 1 year for outcomes of rejection episodes, graft dysfunction, graft loss, infections and death. Result(s): Total 95 patients were included in study, 29 (30.5%) out of them were ABOiKT recipients. Mean (SD) age of study population was 37.8 (+/- 10.5) years. Blood group B to B was the most common ABOcKT and B to O was the most common ABOiKT. Highest baseline isoagglutinin titer was 1:1024.There was no significant difference for rejection episodes, graft dysfunction, graft loss and death in ABOiKT and ABOcKT groups. Urinary tract infection was the most common infection in post-transplant period. COVID-19 was most common viral infection followed by CMV infection. Bacterial infections and overall infections were significantly higher in ABOiKT recipients (p value 0.001 and 0.006 respectively) but severe infections requiring hospitalizations and ICU care were not significantly higher. Two deaths occurred during our study, one in each group. One death was related to COVID-19 infection and second was because of pulmonary mucormycosis. Conclusion(s): Contrary to belief, ABOiKT has non inferior short term outcomes when compared with ABOcKT. Though in our study, bacterial infections were significantly higher in ABOiKT recipients, severe infections requiring hospitalization and ICU care were not increased. ABO incompatible kidney transplantation is an effective modality to increase donor pool and can be applied more widely. No conflict of interestCopyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Individuals with kidney failure face a future requiring long-term treatment with either dialysis or renal transplantation. Renal transplantation is the preferred form of renal replacement therapy, and is associated with a better quality of life, and usually increased longevity. Unfortunately, owing to excessive co-morbidities, only 30% of patients who develop end-stage renal failure are fit enough for transplantation. Over 90% of kidney transplants still function after 1 year, and most function for >15 years. Improvements in transplant outcomes are attributable to advances in histocompatibility testing, organ procurement, organ preservation, surgical techniques and perioperative care. Long-term outcomes have shown only minor improvements over the last two decades, although this should be considered in the context of deteriorating organ quality as older deceased donors with increasing co-morbidity are used more often to satisfy the need for donor organs. An overall increase in deceased donor numbers has boosted transplant activity in the UK, and it is hoped this will continue with the adoption of the 'opt-out' consent system. Living donor activity remains stable, but the use of non-directed altruistic donation and the living donor exchange scheme have reduced the need for higher immunological risk incompatible transplantation. The COVID-19 pandemic has reduced transplant rates globally, although national transplant systems are now recovering.Copyright © 2022
ABSTRACT
Individuals with kidney failure face a future requiring long-term treatment with either dialysis or renal transplantation. Renal transplantation is the preferred form of renal replacement therapy, and is associated with a better quality of life, and usually increased longevity. Unfortunately, owing to excessive co-morbidities, only 30% of patients who develop end-stage renal failure are fit enough for transplantation. Over 90% of kidney transplants still function after 1 year, and most function for >15 years. Improvements in transplant outcomes are attributable to advances in histocompatibility testing, organ procurement, organ preservation, surgical techniques and perioperative care. Long-term outcomes have shown only minor improvements over the last two decades, although this should be considered in the context of deteriorating organ quality as older deceased donors with increasing co-morbidity are used more often to satisfy the need for donor organs. An overall increase in deceased donor numbers has boosted transplant activity in the UK, and it is hoped this will continue with the adoption of the 'opt-out' consent system. Living donor activity remains stable, but the use of non-directed altruistic donation and the living donor exchange scheme have reduced the need for higher immunological risk incompatible transplantation. The COVID-19 pandemic has reduced transplant rates globally, although national transplant systems are now recovering.Copyright © 2022
ABSTRACT
From the start of the COVID-19 pandemic evidence emerged that children were less affected by SARS-CoV- 2 PCR DNA COVID-19 positive infections with increasing evidence showing immunosuppressed children were less at risk compared to immunosuppressed adults. The aim of our study was to investigate how COVID-19 infections affected paediatric renal transplant recipients in the UK. Methods Questionnaires regarding patient demographics renal transplant information COVID-19 infection data and care of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic were sent out to all 13 UK paediatric nephrology centres. Results 54 patients (69% male;50% Black Asian and minority ethnic [BAME];57% living donors) aged 4-19 (median 11) years and between 2 months - 15 years (median 3 years 1 month) post-transplantation from nine centres tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 PCR DNA. Four centres had no positive patients. 48% presented with the classical COVID-19 symptoms (37% fever 11% continuous cough and 4% loss of sense of taste or smell);atypical presentations included diarrhoea (13%) and headache (8%). 37% of patients were asymptomatic. 28% were hospitalised (median stay 2 days) which included asymptomatic patients admitted for other reasons. Of those admitted one patient required oxygen;however, no patients required ventilation or intensive care admission. One child had a rejection episode as a complication of the infection and one adolescent had ongoing cardiorespiratory symptoms for six months. There was evidence of AKI with renal transplant dysfunction in 31% of patients, with increase in mean baseline plasma creatinine from 80.6mmol/l to 171.7mmol/l but no patients required CVVH or dialysis. Conclusion 9% of the UK paediatric renal transplantation population have had documented SARS-CoV-2 PCR DNA infections with 28% required hospitalisation. There was increased prevalence of AKI particularly after the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic possibly due to different variants, although there is no specific virological data to support this.
ABSTRACT
Introduction and Objectives: Cirrhosis and acute liver failure have a high mortality rate and liver transplantation is the only treatment that has shown improvement in the survival of these patients, being 90% in the first year after transplantation and 80% in five years. Currently, in our center there are 95 patients on the liver transplant waiting list, being the largest in the country. The availability of an organ is of key importance and is directly related to the morbidity and mortality of our patients. This study aimed to determine direct and indirect variables that affect mortality on the waiting list in our transplant center. Material(s) and Method(s): We did a retrospective observational study in which we reviewed the clinical charts of the 116 patients who died in the liver transplant list between 2015 and 2021. We described the stage of cirrhosis, its complications and the cause of death. For the analysis of the results, we performed a statistical description. Result(s): Between 2015 and 2021, 116 patients died on the liver transplant waiting list. The cause of cirrhosis was autoimmune disease in 42%of the patients, 75% were CHILD C and 39.7% had MELD >25. The main cause of death was an infection, and the main complications of cirrhosis were ascites (84.5%), encephalopathy (59.5%) and variceal hemorrhage (39.7%). Between 2020 and 2021, COVID-19 infection was documented in 16.7% of deceased patients. Conclusion(s): Infection in patients on the waiting list is the main cause of death before transplantation. It has been documented in the literature that one-year mortality, according to the Meld score, is 30% and 50% for scores of 20-29 and 30-39, respectively. Because of this reason, liver transplantation is the only alternative to impact the survival of these patients. The pandemic contingency affected the care of patients with terminal liver disease, reducing the number of transplants performed because of the lower donation rate. Being pioneers in Colombia of living donor transplantation, it was possible to mitigate the low availability of organs during the Covid-19 pandemic, and in 2020 -2021, 38% of the transplants performed in our center were from a living donor.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Introduction: In developing countries, Post renal-transplant infections is the leading cause of mortality, morbidity and decreased allograft survival. Our aims and objectives was to determine the incidence and prevalence patterns of clinically or microbiologically confirmed infection in the post renal transplant patients of our population and profiling of infections in relation to time period from the Transplant and the induction agent, also to develop strategies to counter risk of post transplant infection. Method(s): This was a retrospective observational study. Time period: January 2020- April 2022. Post renal transplant recipients presenting with infections (with informed consent) was enrolled in this study. Recurrent episodes of infection by different organisms in a same patient treated as a separate event. Data was tabulated using MS excel and all results projected in bar graphs, pie charts, histograms. Differences of quantitative parameters between groups were assessed using the t test(for data that were normally distributed) or nonparametric test (for data that were not normally distributed). Differences of qualitative results were compared using chi2 test. Kaplan-meier was used for survival analysis. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Result(s): 213 incidents of post renal transplant infections were documented in 148 patients between the study period. Of the 85 patients who underwent renal transplant(57 living donor and 28 cadaveric) in this time period 33(38.8%) patients presented with 42 incidents of infections. Majority (74.3%) : Males. Mean age: 36.3+/-5.6 years. Most common cause of native kidney disease was chronic glomerulonephritis(30%). 121 (81.7%) had living donor transplant and 27(8.3%) patients had cadaveric transplant. Induction agent was basiliximab in 97 patients (65.5%) had 133 infections (62.4%) and ATG was used in 51 patients (34.5%) had 80(37.6%) infections. In recent transplant (last 2 yrs) cases-In Basiliximab group: infection rate 4.1 in 100 patient months and in ATG group infection rate was 5.7 in 100 patient months. (p=0.28). 37.5%cases had infections with graft dysfunction most commonly AKI. Immediate post transplant infections (<1 month) were 34 (15.9%), most commonly UTI (44.11%) followed by pneumonia (15.9%). 48(%) infections occurred between 1-6 months, most commonly pneumonia(27.08%) followed by UTI(22.9%) and superficial fungal infection. Pulmonary tuberculosis was in 14 (6.6%) cases. 3 cases had disseminated TB. Infectious diarrhea was in 18(8.4%) cases, most common organism isolated was EAEC and EPEC. CMV colitis found in 3 cases. 27 (18.2%) patients had NODAT/PTDM. ParvoB19 was in 11(5.16%), CMV in 5 and BKVN in 3 cases. 41(19.2%) cases had severe sepsis requiring intensive care support. New baseline s.cr was achieved in 29.1% cases. Infection related death was 24(16.2%). COVID 19 infection was in 41 cases, 31.7% developed graft dysfunction and 18 (43.9%) required hospital admission due to moderate or severe disease. 2 patients had mucormycosis, one of them died after admission. [Formula presented] Conclusion(s): Profiling of infection in our centre is essential to formulate future strategies for infection control especially as the DDKT & ABOi KT is on the rise. Proper survillence, screening protocol, vaccination and patient education are essential to reduce the burden of post transplant infection and for better graft and patient survival. No conflict of interestCopyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Although AVFs are preferred vascular access for hemodialysis, tunneled cuffed catheters(TCC) are increasingly being used as dialysis access in certain clinical situations such as in AVF failure or lack of suitable vessels for AVF creation or bridge to living donor transplant. Aim and objective of this study was to study the characteristics of the population having benefited from tunneled cuffed catheters, to identify the different indications as well as the complications secondary to tunneled cuffed catheters in hemodialysis patients and to determine the catheter and patient survival rate and the factors associated with complications and survival. Method(s): This was an retrospective Observational study done after institutional ethics committee approval. All data was captured using standard proforma. The data was tabulated using MS excel and all results projected in form of bar graphs, pie charts, histograms or tables. Kaplan- meier analysis was used for survival. All patients included in the study consented for the procedure as well as collection of data. 527 TCC placement were done in 498 patients by nephrologists without fluoroscopy in a percutaneous fashion between jan 2021 to march 2022. Minimum follow up was 12 months. 37 patients lost to follow up. Result(s): 316 (68.5%) were males and mean age was 48.3+/-12.6 years. Staggered tip MAHURKAR MaxidTM Covidien, was used in every patient. Most common native kidney disease was cresentic GN 176(38.1%). Most common Site of TCC was right internal jugular 88.9%(441/496), followed by left internal jugular 10.48%(52/496), femoral TCC done in 0.6%. Mean blood flow achieved was 311+/- 32ml/min. Most common indication of TCC placement was starting of HD after 1/2 temporary access- 162(32.66%), followed by awaiting Maturation of autogenous AVF 66 (13.3%) and awaiting living-related transplantation 54(10.88%). Total catheter related infective episodes (CRBSI) were 229 (1.07 episodes/1000catheter days),Exit site infection was in 57 cases (0.26 /1000 catheter days), Tunnel infection was in 51(0.19/1000 catheter days), Infective endocarditis was seen in 3 cases. Catheter loss due to CRBSI was 23 (12.16%). Most common organism was Enterococci (29.7%), followed by s.aureus (24.32%). Most common immediate complication was tunnel bleeding (5.9% ), followed by improper tip position 4.68%. Late complications due to TCC thrombosis/ fibrin sheath was 74(15.07%). Recanalisation with urokinase was successful in 36.84%. Central venous stenosis was in 26 cases. successful recanalisation after central venoplasty was 16/19 (84.21%). Mean catheter survival was 201.9 +/- 114.9 days (3day to 12 months). Catheter survival at the end of 3 months was 75.76%, at 6 months 63.4%, at 12months 32.17%. Patient survival at 6 months was 86.7%, at 12 months- 77.5%. Most common cause of death was unrelated to TCC - cardiovascular cause (77.6%). Direct TCC related death was in 5 cases. Most common cause of catheter drop out was patient death (33.03%), followed by maturation of AVF (22.82%), catheter thrombosis/fibrin sheath (22.2%). [Formula presented] Conclusion(s): Though AVF is the best access, for late unplanned HD initiation in many CKD patients, TCC insertion becomes next best option. In access crisis patients, TCC may remain one feasible option for bridge to available live donor transplant. With strict asepsis protocol and technical aptitude TCC placement is safe with few side effects. No conflict of interestCopyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has significantly impacted liver tran splantation worldwide, leading to major effects on the transplant process, including the pretransplant, perioperative, and post-transplant periods. It is believed that patients with chronic liver disease, especially those with cirrhosis, have a higher risk of complications from coronavirus disease 2019 infection compared to the general population. However, evaluation of coronavirus disease 2019 effects on liver transplant patients has not uniformly demonstrated worse outcomes. Nonetheless, the pandemic created significant challenges and restrictions on transplant policies and organ allocation.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Liver transplantation (LT) is the second most common solid organ transplantation, however, less than 10% of global transplantation needs are achieved. Low- and middle- income countries (LMIC's) are the most affected. A university- based Center for Global Surgery and our LT team joined efforts in 2017 to create an international alliance for clinical care and academic endeavors. Here we describe our experience establishing a LT mentoring group within an academic Center for Global Surgery. Method(s): This is a retrospective observational study. We evaluated the number of clinical, research and educational activities that our program did with LMICs from 2009 to 2022. Surgeries, patient evaluation, and follow-up were done in a multidisciplinary fashion with protocols from our LT program in partnership with LMIC's teams and via telehealth. Most educational and research activities were done online. Result(s): We performed 15 surgeries in pediatric and adult patients, including cadaveric, living donor LT, portosystemic shunts, and resections, and evaluated 27 patients from LMIC's. We have submitted 2 articles, presented 5 s, and obtained 1 grant. Our group received support to sponsor 1 research scholar per year and we had 15 bilateral exchange visits and organized 27 online multidisciplinary education sessions in collaboration with centers from LMIC'S. Conclusion(s): Our data shows that global transplant efforts with a multidisciplinary model can have clinical and academic impact. It is feasible to partner and mentor LT programs in LMICs through telehealth and exchange programs. Funding of these efforts remains challenging, and COVID-19 has limited academic and clinical activities.
ABSTRACT
In Japan, since the revision of the Organ Transplant Law in July 2010, donation after brain death (DBD) has increased, while donation after cardiac death (DCD), which has been mainly used by kidney transplantation, has decreased. The number of DCD donors decreased from 98 in 2009 to 28 in 2019. There is no clear reason for the decrease in DCD donors. Furthermore, since 2020, there has been a marked decrease in DCD due to the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic. On the other hand, the outcomes after kidney transplantation from DCD donors are improving year by year. The outcomes of kidney transplantation from DCD donors in Japan are comparable to those of kidney transplantation from DBD donors in Western countries. In order to further improve transplantation outcomes from DCD donors, the clinical introduction of continuous machine perfusion preservation technology, for the purpose of reducing ischemic reperfusion injury, is expected in Japan.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: Primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) recurs after kidney transplantation (KT) in 30-50% of recipients with a median time of 1.5 months post- KT. Recurrence is associated with early graft loss in 60% of cases. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of pre-emptive therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) and rituximab for the prevention of FSGS recurrence post-KT. Method(s): This single-center, retrospective study included patients receiving KT for primary FSGS between May 2016 and August 2021. Living-donor KT recipients received three sessions of TPE prior to scheduled transplant. Recipients of both living and deceased donor KT received 3 postoperative sessions of TPE followed by one dose of 375 mg/m2 rituximab with or without intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) 0.5 g/kg. Recipients underwent protocol biopsy at one month to screen for FSGS recurrence. The primary endpoint was a composite for disease recurrence including proteinuria (>=1 g/day) or/and biopsy-proven FSGS within one month. Result(s): 54 patients received KT for FSGS during the study period using the TPE/ rituximab protocol. 5 patients (9%) experienced FSGS recurrence within one month of transplant. A total of 10 patients (19%) were found to have disease recurrence within a year, with median (IQR) time to recurrence of 37 days (27-66). White race and history of hypertension were independent risk factors for recurrence, whereas African American race and diabetes were associated with a reduced risk of recurrence. 31 patients (57%) also received IVIG prior to discharge due to concerns for hypogammaglobulinemia. There were 18 documented infections in 13 patients (24%) within 3 months of transplant. Patients who received IVIG had significantly fewer cases of infection (3 cases: 1 viral and 2 COVID-19) compared to patients who did not receive IVIG (15 cases: 4 bacterial, 9 viral, 1 fungal, and 1 COVID-19), p<0.001. At one year, 9 patients (19%) had biopsy-proven rejection (5 acute cellular rejection, 1 antibody-mediated rejection, and 3 mixed rejection). There were no instances of graft loss or mortality observed at one year. Conclusion(s): The utilization of plasma exchange and rituximab may prevent early disease recurrence of FSGS without significant rates of infection, graft loss, or mortality.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: Administration of mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines confers protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection and reduces its severity in the general population. It has been suggested that mounting a coordinated adaptive immune response characterized by production of neutralizing antibodies and SARS-CoV-2 spike proteinspecific T-cells correlates with protection from infection. Studies in organ transplant recipients have demonstrated suboptimal responses after 2 doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination;however, the impact of different immunosuppressive regimens (IS) on T-cell responses is not well described. This study prospectively evaluated the impact of IS on T-cell responses in a kidney transplant (KTx) population and compared these to 26 healthy controls. Method(s): In this single-centre, prospective study, 92 KTx on follow-up at our centre were enrolled after informed consent. T-cell responses were evaluated before and after each of 2 doses of BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine administered 21 days apart: before each dose, 10-14 days after Dose1 and 21-24 days after Dose2. The study population included 69.6% Live-Donor and 30.4% Deceased-Donor KTx. Longitudinal assessment of the quantity of spike-specific T-cells was performed by stimulating whole blood with peptides covering the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, followed by cytokine (IFN-gamma, IL-2) measurement (JCI, Tan et al, 2021). KTx were stratified by maintenance IS into 4 groups and T-cell responses compared between groups. Result(s): As shown (Figures 1A, 1B), in comparison to healthy controls, KTx displayed poor spike-specific T-cell responses as measured by IFN-gamma and IL-2 release. Percent responders were significantly lower for KTx vs. healthy controls: 6.5% vs. 92.3% after Dose1 (P<0.00001) and 27.2% vs. 100% after Dose2 respectively. There was a significant impact of different IS regimens (Figure 1C);percent responders after Dose2 were 19%, 43%, 40% and 71% for KTx receiving CNI-MPA-Pred, CNI-Aza-Pred, mTORi and Other regimens respectively (P=0.013). Conclusion(s): Our results highlight the critical role of IS on T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, monitoring T-cell and antibody responses over time after vaccination, modulating IS and modifying vaccination strategies are clearly needed to protect this vulnerable population.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) created a research variance allowing for transplantation of HIV+ donor kidneys and livers into HIV+ recipients after passage of the HIV Organ Policy Equity (HOPE) Act legislation in 2013 and subsequent published research criteria in November 2015. In May 2020 the OPTN modified the variance to include all solid organs. Method(s): The OPTN database was used to analyze temporal trends in waiting list registrations, HIV+ donors, HOPE transplant recipients, and program participation in the OPTN HOPE Act variance. HIV+ donors were identified through HIV serology/ NAT fields collected by the OPTN;recipients of these organs are HOPE recipients. Result(s): Transplant program participation saw consistent growth but has remained stable for the two years (Fig A). Despite this, patient demand for HOPE kidneys has been simultaneously declining, perhaps driven by a decline in listings related to Hypertensive Nephrosclerosis and DM Type II (listings for HIV Nephropathy remained stable), while liver demand remains low but stable (Fig B). Concurrently, there has been a consistent volume of recovered HIV+ donors and organs transplanted (Fig C, D). Transplant volume recently exceeded 300 organs transplanted (300 deceased donor, 3 living donor), largely driven by kidney (236 kidney, 67 liver;11 SLK) from 187 recovered HIV+ donors. Living donation of HIV+ organs remains limited to kidney. Among HIV+ deceased donors, the kidney discard rate was 32% while the liver discard rate was 4%. Twenty-nine recovered deceased donors had no organs transplanted, and associated common discard reasons for these donors were exhausted match runs and biopsy findings. Conclusion(s): The OPTN database does not include HIV status at listing;therefore, the decline in demand cannot be attributed to potential access changes for HIV+ patients, but may be related to the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic have not noticeably affected HOPE Act transplant volumes, highlighting the resiliency of the US transplant system. Based on consistent activity and positive data and safety analyses through five years, the OPTN recommended removal of the research criteria as a potential barrier to expanded utilization of the HOPE Act to HHS, in turn making HIV-to-HIV transplantation standard of care;the result of that recommendation is pending. (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
Purpose: Adverse events of a novel mRNA vaccine are not well described in Kidney Transplant Recipients(KTR), especially the risk of immune activation or recurrent glomerulonephritis(GN), which has been described in native GN after COVID-19 vaccines. Method(s): In this single-center prospective study, 147 KTR were enrolled after informed consent and administered 2 doses of Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine 21 days apart. Follow-up was 3 weeks after Dose2. Result(s): Mean age of KTR was 51 years;55.1% male;65.3% Chinese, 19% Malay, 11.6% Indian;69.5% Living donor, 29.9% Deceased donor, 0.7% Pancreas-kidney transplants;71.5% had biopsy-proven or presumptive chronic GN(CGN), 12.9% diabetic nephropathy, 15.6% other causes. 11(7.5%) KTR had delayed Dose2 administered at median 29 days(range 24-93) after Dose1. 7(4.8%)were delayed due to renal events: rise in creatinine(n=3), or proteinuria(n=2), or both creatinine and proteinuria with allograft biopsy showing acute T-cell and antibody-mediated rejection(n=1), new BK viraemia(n=1). Other reasons were possible anaphylaxis(n=1), intercurrent infection(n=2), and inability to attend due to quarantine(n=1). 27 KTR had new microhaematuria(MH) after Dose1;9 persisted after Dose2. Additional 18 had new MH after Dose2. Of 45 KTR with new MH, 7 had underlying IgAN, 5 had other biopsy-proven-CGN and 22 had presumed CGN, suggesting 34/45 with possible immune activation. 12 KTR had new onset proteinuria (rise in urine protein:creatinine ratio (UPCR) <=30 to >30mg/mmol);5/7 who developed a rise after Dose1 remained elevated;additional 5 had a rise after Dose2. 7 KTR had rise in proteinuria from UPCR <=100 to >100mg/mmol. Conclusion(s): Subclinical changes in allograft monitoring parameters are frequent after COVID-19 mRNA vaccines with up to 40.1% of KTRs showing rises in creatinine, proteinuria or new MH. Although overt recurrent GN and acute rejection are infrequent, high vigilance and monitoring for these occurrences should be undertaken in KTRs receiving mRNA vaccines.